Advocacy Tracker

Energy
Automatic Commercial Ice Makers

Energy – for the cold-side product categories below, NAFEM meets with DOE Jan. 8, 2026 in response to the agency’s interest in learning more about our industry, how standards are applied and their impact on the industry.

  IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
DOE issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to rescind the amended water use standards. The proposal will return the standards to the statutory baseline.EERE-2017-BT-STD-0022– Comment period closed July 15. 
Commercial Refrigeration Equipment
  IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
Standards withdrawn under the Congressional Review Act.  EERE-2017-BT-STD-0007
Walk-in Coolers/Freezers
  IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
Standards withdrawn under the Congressional Review Act.EERE-2017-BT-STD-0007 
Process Rule
 IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
1DOE issued an RFI for comments on the Process Rule that identifies the rulemaking process for energy-conservation standards for commercial equipment.EERE-2025-BT-STD-0001-0001NAFEM comments.
Joint industry comments.
Other Energy items NAFEM is tracking

States setting energy-efficiency standards 

  • The following states, plus Washington, D.C., have energy-efficiency standards in place for a variety of commercial foodservice equipment: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington[1].
  • Multiple states – Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island – and Washington D.C., require manufacturers of dishwashers, fryers, hot food holding cabinets, ovens and steam cookers and other products to register with the State Appliance Standards Database (SASD). Distributors, retailers and installers must verify that required products are listed with SASD before sale, lease, rental or installation.
  • The California Energy Commission requires manufacturers to certify the performance of refrigeration products sold in the state via its Modernized Appliance Efficiency Database System (MAEDbS). Manufacturers must submit data directly to CEC’s database from a CEC-recognized testing lab or submit a form for each product category that authorizes the testing lab as their representative for submitting appliance data. UL Solutions, Intertek and AHRI can submit to CEC, DOE, ENERGY STAR® and NRCan in one stop. The Food Service Technology Center (FSTC), Southern California Edison Foodservice Technology Center (FTC) and SoCalGas Food Service Equipment Center also are CEC-approved testing labs for commercial foodservice equipment.
  • SASD and MAEDbS do not share information, so manufacturers must register with both databases to sell products in the covered states.

ENERGY STAR® under scrutiny; component inspection program expands

  • Along with many other federal programs, ENERGY STAR is under scrutiny. NAFEM is working with like-minded stakeholders who want to see the program remain under the federal government’s purview. In the meantime, the ENERGY STAR component inspection program expands to electric cooktops in 2025. Check here or contact advocacy@nafem.org for more information. The current program covers commercial steam cookers; dishwashers; convection, combi and gas-rack ovens; commercial electric cooktops; commercial coffee and tea brewers; fryers; griddles and hot food holding cabinets.

As lithium-ion battery use increases, resources available

  • NAFEM’s Fuels (F) Task Group discussed the increased use of lithium-ion batteries to peak shave or provide consistent power during brownouts or failures. The task group recommended a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) podcast on the proper use and handling of the batteries in commercial and residential applications. Battery Council International (BCI) also has useful online information about lithium-ion batteries. 
Environment
  IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
1EPA final rule restrictions on the use of certain HFCs establishes a process for submitting technology transitions petitions and establishes recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

In September, EPA issued a proposal to relax certain compliance deadlines and thresholds of the October 2023 final rule.
Final Rule: EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0643-0026 

Sept. Proposal 
– Final rule Oct. 5, 2023.
– Compliance dates vary from Jan. 1, 2025, to Jan. 1, 2028.
– Comment period on Sept. proposal closed Nov. 17. 
2In 2024 EPA proposed adding individual PFAS and 15 PFAS categories representing more than 100 individual PFAS, to the Toxics Release Inventory.   EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0538– Comment period closed Dec. 9, 2024
3EPA issued an interim final rule delaying the PFAS reporting period under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Any company that manufactured (including imported) PFAS for a commercial purpose from Jan. 2011 – Dec. 2022 will be required to report.EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0549– Interim final rule issued May 13.
– Compliance dates vary from April 13 – Oct. 13, 2026.
4EPA proposes amending the procedural framework rule for conducting existing chemical risk evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).EPA-HQ-OPPT-2025-0260  Comment period closed Nov. 7 
5Substitute refrigerants acceptable in refrigeration systems are listed in the proposed Significant New Alternative Program (SNAP) Rule 27.  EPA-HQ-OAR-2024-0503 
Fact sheet 
Comments due Dec. 26
Other Environmental items NAFEM is tracking

NAFEM and members petition EPA for a three-year extension for ACIM AIM Act compliance

  • Several challenges make it impossible for automatic commercial ice machine (ACIM) manufacturers to modify their product portfolios to new refrigerants by current deadlines, so NAFEM and members Follett and Hoshizaki America petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a three-year extension for current American Innovation and Manufacturing Act (AIM) requirements to adopt these new refrigerants, from 2026 or 2027 to 2029 or 2030.

PFAS updates

Current and proposed state and federal regulations addressing PFAS are included in the regularly updated Complex Product Manufacturers Coalition spreadsheet. Additional information on state efforts follows.

  • The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) released draft regulations implementing its PFAS Protection Act (HB 212). The proposal includes labeling requirements for covered and some exempt products that could impact NAFEM members. NMED aims to issue final rules by June 30.
  • In response to NAFEM’s request for clarity, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) edited its guidance to the state’s Consumer PFAS Ban Act of 2024. “Cookware items with electrical components are not included within the definition of cookware. For example, an electric coffee machine is not subject to the ban.”
  • Canada requires manufacturing and other facilities to report the use of PFAS to the National Pollution Release Inventory. Canada also is considering regulating PFAS as a class under its Environmental Protection Act, rather than treating each substance individually. Canada also is considering a three-phase risk-management approach looking for PFAS alternatives and evaluating social-economic as well as technical considerations.

HFC-related updates

  • EPA updated hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) data – including imports, exports, inventory and destruction, as well as allowance transfers and expenditures – is available on the EPA HFC Data Hub.
  • Washington State’s HFC and Other Fluorinated Gases Rule, which requires transitions away from some HFC, aerosol propellants and foams, takes effect Nov. 29. The Rule aligns with EPA’s transition dates for Automatic Commercial Ice Makers. Contact Gopika Patwa at the state’s Department of Ecology with questions
  • New York’s Part 494 HFC Standards and Reporting regulation, adopted in January 2025, included prohibitions on new products and equipment that contain HFCs and controls on HFC leaks in commercial equipment. Suppliers, including manufacturers, of products that contain HFCs are subject to reporting and record-keeping requirements. The state recently updated its Fact Sheet and FAQs.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) updates

EPR efforts hold producers responsible for the lifecycle of their products. Multiple states have approved EPR compliance plans primarily focused on packaging such as plastics, paper and single-use products including California, Colorado, Maine and Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington. Others are considering similar programs. As this issue is expected to intensify, NAFEM’s legal counsel provided an overview.

  • California, Oregon and Minnesota are the first states to require producers to join Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO) for packaged items, food service wares, certain types of equipment, and plastic or paper products, although the laws are written somewhat differently.
  • California’s Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act requires producers of commercial single-use packaging to join a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) to fund the end of life of those materials. The state has engaged the nonprofit Circular Action Alliance (CAA) to administer its program. CAA operates as the single PRO in California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota and Oregon.
  • NAFEM joined numerous organizations expressing concern to Colorado Governor Jared Polis about the state’s Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) requested removal of mass balance as a measurement tool for recycled materials, despite this being a gold standard international approach to certification. Colorado continues to work toward its EPR program, also with CAA.
  • In Minnesota, the Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) was charged with appointing a 15-member Task Force to advise the agency on policy and program opportunities that would increase the recovery of critical materials – including aluminum, cobalt, copper, nickel and silicon – from end-of-life products. The Task Force is meeting through 2025. MPCA also oversees the state’s Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act that requires producers – generally the brand owner, manufacturer or importer – to participate in a PRO, to coordinate and fund the statewide program. A fact sheet provides more information.
  • In Quebec, the Commercial Appliance Recovery Society (SORAC) is an extended PRO focused primarily on recovery and recycling of refrigeration and freezer equipment. SORAC is funded by manufacturers and others.

California climate disclosure bills could impact members

  • CA SB 253 requires public and private companies with annual revenues of $1 billion or more and do business in California to report Scope 1 and 2 emissions by Aug. 10, 2026. The California Air resources Board (CARB) has delayed reporting of Scope 3 emissions until 2027. .
  • CA SB 261 (Climate-Related Financial Risk Act) requires public and private companies with annual revenues of $500 million or more that do business in California to complete the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and post to their websites before Jan. 1, 2026. However, Nov. 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted an injunction pending appeal that suspends enforcement of the Jan. 1, 2026 deadline while litigation continues.
  • Members are encouraged to discuss reporting requirements for SB 253 and 261 with legal counsel.

Decarbonization efforts continue

  • Decarbonization efforts continue at the state, federal and international levels and the industry should anticipate continued discussion and regulatory requirements intended to phase out the use of fossil fuels and natural gas. For example: 
    • The New York ban on natural gas and other fossil fuels applies to new buildings shorter than seven stories by 2026, and taller buildings by 2029. 
    • More than 100 U.S. cities have moved to restrict gas-powered appliances. Most of these bans focus on new construction. Members should check local requirements as this is an evolving situation. 

Update on EU/UK F-gases

  • NAFEM has been notified by the U.K. Foodservice Equipment Association that the U.K. does not have a timeline for implementing changes to its F-gas regulations that differ from the EU F-gas regulations. Manufacturers have been urged to find alternative refrigerants to comply with the EU F-gas regulations in 2026.
Regulations
Federal regulation-related items
  IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
1OSHA’s proposed Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings.OSHA-2021-0009
– Transcripts of June/July virtual hearings are available online 
– Post-hearing comment period closed Sept. 30. 
2The proposed Heat Workforce Standards Act  of 2025 was introduced in the Houe as the preferred alternative to the above OSHA proposed ruleHR 6213– Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce Nov. 20.
– NAFEM letter of support.
3The U.S. Senate Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury, and Fatality Prevention Act would require OSHA to establish an enforceable federal standard to protect workers in high-heat environments.S 2501 – Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions July 26.

Review NAFEM’s Global Market and Conformity Guide for links to international certification requirements and resources. 

Other Regulation-related items NAFEM is tracking

New regulations addressing potential AI discrimination

  • Numerous states have or are considering AI-related restrictions. Members are encouraged to closely follow these developing regulations that generally mandate against “AI-generated algorithmic discrimination” in hiring, promotions and other decisions. 

California Prop 65 labeling requirements require ongoing monitoring

  • California’s Proposition 65 – The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act – requires companies to provide warning labels to notify people of exposure to more than 1,000 chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. Members should review the requirements of Prop 65 impacting their businesses.

NAFEM and others request suspension of WA lead in cookware regs

  • Until a clear and reasonable path forward for compliance with Washington State’s pending lead in cookware regulations can be found, NAFEM and several other associations requested a temporary discretion or suspension of agency enforcement on the Cookware Containing Lead law. While Washington State increased the allowable lead in cookware to 90 parts per million (ppm) through Dec. 31, 2027, the allowable limit decreases to 10 ppm Jan. 1, 2028.
Taxes, Tariffs & Trade

The latest tariff information, including that below, is available on the Taxes, Tariffs and Trade page of nafem.org. While NAFEM regularly updates this resource page, we recommend regular communication with your customs broker for the most current tariff information relative to your business and its products.  

  IssueDocket No./LinkStatus/Notes
1The U.S. Department of Commerce is conducting a Section 232 investigation of the security risks of imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment and their derivative products.XRIN 0694-XC121– Report due Dec. 27.
2The administration launched a Section 301 investigation into Brazil’s trade practices.USTR–2025–0043– Comment period closed Aug. 18.
– USTR held a hearing Sept. 3.
3The U.S. Secretary of Commerce initiated a Section 232 investigation under the Trade Expansion Act to assess whether imports of robotics and industrial machinery, and parts/components, pose a risk to national security.250924-0161 
– Comment period closed Oct. 17. 
– Report due March 2026
4The USMCA is up for the mandatory six-year review in 2026. According to the terms, if any country objects to extending the agreement, it triggers an annual approval process and a countdown to the USMCA’s end in 2036. In anticipation of upcoming negotiations, the USTR is seeking public comments. USTR-2025-0004 and USTR-2025-0005– Comment period closed Nov. 3. 
– Public hearing held Nov. 17. 
NAFEM letter of support.
6The Secure Trade Act would codify a 10% baseline tariff on all imported goods. It also revises HTS categories to create a 35% tariff on nonstrategic goods from China and a 100% tariff on strategic goods from the country. HR 4978 

IEEPA ruling pending; tips for planning ahead

While we wait for the Supreme Court’s ruling on the legality of the IEEPA tariffs, NAFEM’s legal team at Barnes & Thornburg suggest members begin to prepare for potential tariff refunds, even though it’s uncertain what the process might entail. If the court uses the CBP process, importers will need to file a formal protest within 180 days of liquidation to protect the right to a refund. Detailed information is on Barnes &Thornburg’s website.

Section 301 tariffs upheld  

The SCOTUS elected not to hear a final appeal questioning the legality of the Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods. As all lower courts found the tariffs legal, they will remain in effect.  


OTHER TOPICS?

If there is a topic you would like NAFEM to address, please contact us at advocacy@nafem.org.